
STATE OF NEW YORK
INSURANCE DEPARTMENT
25
BEAVER STREET
NEW YORK,
NEW YORK 10004
| George E. Pataki Governor |
Howard Mills |
Circular Letter No. 1 (2006) January 18, 2006 |
| TO: | ALL PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURERS AND RATE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS DOING BUSINESS IN NEW YORK STATE, NEW YORK PROPERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, STATE INSURANCE FUND, NEW YORK AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE PLAN, AND EXCESS LINE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK |
| RE: | GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE EXTENSION ACT OF 2005 |
| STATUTORY REFERENCE: ARTICLES 21, 23, 34, 54 AND 63 OF THE INSURANCE LAW; TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE EXTENSION ACT OF 2005 |
Commercial automobile insurance ·
Revisions to the recoupment provisions. For purposes of recouping the Federal share of
compensation under the Act, the insurance marketplace aggregate retention
amount for the two additional years of the Program is increased from the level in
Program Year 3. For Program Year 4 the
insurance marketplace aggregate retention amount is established as the lesser
of $25 billion and the aggregate amount, for all insurers, of insured losses during
Program Year 4. The insurance
marketplace aggregate retention amount for Program Year 5 is the lesser of $27.5
billion and the aggregate amount, for all insurers, of insured losses during Program Year
5. The U.S. Department of the Treasury
issued an interim guidance notice to assist insurers in meeting their obligations under
the Extension Act pending the issuance of final regulations.
In Circular Letter No. 25 (2002) and Supplement, the Insurance Department addressed
filing requirements and disclosure obligations as they apply to policies issued on New
York risks. Those instructions remain largely
applicable for policies issued after the effective date of the Extension Act. With respect to disclosure requirements, this
Departments previous Circular Letter deemed acceptable the model disclosure notice
forms adopted by the NAIC, which Treasury deemed to be in compliance with the Act. The
model notice forms may continue to be used pending further guidance from Treasury, which
we understand it intends to issue in the near future.
In Circular Letter No. 25 (2002),
the Department stated the following: In recognition of the
limited definition of "insured loss" under the Act and the requirement that
insurers must make available such coverage, the Superintendent will consider for approval,
on an expedited basis, policy provisions that exclude coverage, or limit the amount
thereof, for an "insured loss", provided that the insurer has first satisfied
the "make available" requirements of the Act; the exclusion or limitation
applies solely to "insured loss" under the Act; the language of the exclusion or
limitation mirrors the definition of "insured loss"; and the policy language is
otherwise clear and not misleading. Such exclusions and limitation provisions remain
subject to the applicable prior approval and all other statutory and regulatory
requirements of the Insurance Law. Insurers and rate service
organizations subsequently submitted exclusion forms which this Department approved in
conformity with the foregoing and which were intended to be used only with respect to
insured losses. Inasmuch as commercial automobile insurance, burglary and theft
insurance, surety insurance, professional liability insurance and farm owners multi peril
insurance are no longer included within the definition of property and casualty
insurance and losses from these lines are no longer included within the definition
of insured loss under the Extension Act, the continued use of the exclusion
endorsements that had been specifically approved for use under the original Act for these
lines would be misleading. The Department would consider the issuance or renewal of
policies by an insurer with such endorsements to be an unfair trade practice.
Accordingly, the exclusion endorsements are not to be used for these lines of insurance
for new and renewal policies with effective dates on and after January 1, 2006, the
effective date of the Extension Act. Insurers and rate service
organizations should make appropriate form and/or rule filings to recognize that the lines
of insurance listed above are no longer covered under the Extension Act, but may, pending
submission and approval of such filings, continue to use previously approved forms solely
with respect to lines of insurance for which coverage remains in effect under the
Extension Act. Questions regarding this Circular Letter may be addressed to Martin Schwartzman, Assistant Chief, Property Bureau at (212) 480-5563 or .
|
Very truly
yours,
Mark Presser
|
|