Skip to Content

Banking Interpretations

NYSBL 143-b

Memorandum


January 8, 1985

To: Examiner Zanko

From: Assistant Counsel Barras

Re: [ ] -- Possible Control Application


The facts in this case indicate that four indi- viduals are proposing to make a tender offer for the subject bank. Apparently, this would be the first hostile takeover since Section 143-b was amended by Chapter 793 of the Laws of 1980. After considering the issues involved, I suggest that you advise the tenderors as follows:

  1. In view of the fact that Section 143-b mandates that the approval of the Banking Board be obtained before any company (defined in Section 141(2) to include an individual or combination of individuals) acquires control of a banking institution, the company in the instant case should structure its tender offer so that it has not legally acquired more than 10% of the voting stock before such approval is obtained. This could be accomplished by conditioning the tender offer not only on the acquisition of a certain percentage of shares but also on the acquisition of the required Banking Board approval.
  2. You indicated that [ ], one of the tenderors, currently owns over 50% of the [ ] National Bank. Therefore, if [ ] also "controlled" [ ] Bank, he would be a "bank holding company" under Section 141(3). Consequently, [ ] should file a separate application under Section 142. However, I see no need to require that 2 investigation fees be paid because only 1 trans- action is really involved here.
  3. You may also wish to advise [ ] of the provisions of Section 143(3)(a) wherein It would be illegal for him to serve as executive officer of the bank holding company and as executive officer of a bank or national bank without Banking Board approval.

S. R. B.

Department of Financial Services

CONNECT WITH US

DFS Facebook page

Follow NYDFS on Twitter

REGISTER TO VOTE

Sign up online or download and mail in your application.