DFS Fines Applied Underwriters $3 Million for Unlicensed Workers’ Comp Insurance Business

DFS Fines Applied Underwriters $3 Million for Unlicensed Workers’ Comp Insurance Business

Applied Underwriters Overcharged Many Small and Medium-Sized Employers for Unapproved Workers’ Compensation Products that Violated New York Law

Financial Services Superintendent Linda A. Lacewell today announced the Department of Financial Services (DFS) has fined Applied Underwriters $3 million for offering workers’ compensation insurance bundled with side agreements called “Reinsurance Participation Agreements,” which were not filed with or approved by the Department.  Under these side agreements many employers, including small businesses, paid substantially more than what would have been paid under similar workers’ compensation plans.

“Small businesses are the backbone of New York’s economy, making up 98% of businesses in the State and employing more than half of our private-sector workforce,” said Superintendent Lacewell.  “DFS is committed to protecting all consumers, including our small business owners and today we are holding Applied Underwriters responsible for illegally operating outside of the Department’s oversight to sell a complex product to hundreds of New York small and medium-sized businesses.  New York will continue to enforce the insurance law’s licensing and filing requirements to protect employers and other consumers from surprise bills.”

Applied offered workers compensation insurance products from as early as January 2010, to late 2016, in New York under multiple names, including “SolutionOne” and “EquityComp.” The products included guaranteed-cost workers’ compensation policies issued by Applied subsidiary Continental Indemnity Company, on forms and rates approved by DFS along with a side agreement titled a “Reinsurance Participation Agreement” that employers were also required to enter into as part of the bundle.  However, the side agreement, or RPA, was not filed with DFS, and as a result the RPA and the Program as a whole were not reviewed or approved by the Department.

DFS’s investigation found that the formula by which the RPAs calculated costs was complex and the way in which it was presented to employers was misleading.  Under the formula, policy fees could rise rapidly with the first few claims to levels substantially higher than what would have been paid under a typical linear retrospective model.  Many New York employers paid more for coverage than they would have paid under the workers’ compensation policies alone, with many paying significantly more.

The DFS investigation found that Applied’s offering:

  • was misleading in how it represented potential costs;
  • required employers to wait three years, or in some cases up to seven years, for advertised “profit distributions”; and
  • often resulted in fees that were higher than the rates in the filed and approved insurance policy.

DFS’s Consent Order states that Applied has ceased offering the bundle in New York, will not offer any equivalent side agreements going forward, and will file any future products with the Department for approval.  Additionally, Applied will not enforce any arbitration provisions under contracts agreed to in New York or with New York employers.

A copy of the consent order can be found here.

The case was handled by Associate Counsel Bruce Wells and Senior Counsel Paul Geoghan under the supervision of Deputy Superintendent Christopher B. Mulvihill of the Consumer Protection and Financial Enforcement Division’s Enforcement Unit. The Consumer Protection and Financial Enforcement Division is supervised by Executive Deputy Superintendent Katherine A. Lemire.


Contact the Press Office

Contact us by phone:
(212) 709-1691
Contact us by email: